Performance review calibration is a topic central to the discussion of performance evaluations. Objectivity in grading criteria is an issue that has haunted performance appraisals since their inception. Evaluating performance is an incredibly nuanced undertaking and every step of the way, there are some rather treacherous pitfalls to avoid.
What if two people in different departments hold their employees up to completely separate standards? What if this discrepancy in standards affects the bonuses employees receive at the end of a review period? Can reviewers avoid unintentional review biases?
These are all perfectly reasonable questions surrounding the discussion of performance reviews. The answer to all of those questions and the issues they imply?
Performance review calibration! That is why in this article we will not only give you the definition of performance review calibration but also best practices on how you can calibrate your performance reviews, as well as how you can avoid running into those issues in the first place!
Before the “How?” and “Why?” of performance review calibration, let’s answer the “What?” first. What is performance review calibration? To give you a simple definition: Performance review calibration is the process of standardizing the evaluation of employee performance across different departments or teams within an organization.
The process of calibrating your reviews includes a group of managers and leaders who review and discuss the performance ratings given by individual supervisors to ensure that they align with the organization’s standards and expectations.
Let’s understand the need for performance review calibration and the purpose it serves through a short case.
Background: Imagine a medium-sized technology company, TechFlow Inc., which has recently experienced rapid growth. The company has several departments, including Software Development, Sales, Marketing, and Customer Support. Each department is managed by different team leads and managers who are responsible for conducting performance reviews of their team members.
Situation: During the annual performance review cycle, it was observed that the ratings and feedback varied significantly across departments. For instance:
Resulting Issues: This inconsistency in ratings led to several issues:
The Need for Calibration: This particular performance review example clearly demonstrates the need for performance review calibration in TechFlow Inc. By implementing a calibration process, the company could:
Performance review calibration is essential in this scenario to align the company’s performance evaluations, ensuring fairness, consistency, and transparency across all departments. It helps in maintaining employee morale and trust in the system while supporting more objective and strategic HR decisions.
Now that we’ve covered the “What?” and the “Why?”, the time has come to cover the “How?”. A well-executed performance review calibration process should include several key components to ensure its effectiveness. We’ve highlighted the most important components below, as well as how you can utilize them and calibrate your performance reviews.
Calibration should involve a thorough review of diverse performance data. When we mean comprehensive data, it is not just numerical ratings or scores, but also qualitative feedback, self-assessments, peer reviews, and any other relevant performance indicators.
The best way to make sure you have access to this data when it comes time to conduct your performance reviews is to track them using a complete performance management platform.
That being said if your organization is using Microsoft Teams or Outlook on a daily basis, then the best option for you would be: Teamflect.
Teamflect users can not only set and track goals, exchange feedback, and manage performance throughout the year, but also integrate all of that data into their performance reviews for a completely objective review process!
Those who hope to take up the mantle of reviewer in performance reviews have to put their heads together and define what constitutes high, average, and low performance. These benchmarks should be understood and agreed upon by all managers involved in the calibration process.
The same goes for the criteria against which your employees will be judged. While there are bound to be departmental differences in performance evaluation criteria, these should be ironed out far ahead of performance appraisals. In fact, they should be determined before the review period even begins.
No matter how you establish your criteria or benchmarks for core performance metrics and competencies, performance review calibration meetings are essential for ensuring consistency and fairness in employee evaluations. If your review calibration meeting agenda covers the following areas, you should have some bias-free, objective reviews in your hands.
Those partaking in the review calibration meeting, mostly managers and other reviewers, should take the time to discuss and confirm the KPI’s and metrics that were agreed upon previously and are being used to evaluate employees, ensuring alignment with organizational goals as well.
This is where the true calibration begins. Each manager has to present their team members’ performance ratings and provide a brief justification for each. This is your opportunity to address any significant discrepancies in ratings between similar roles across different teams or departments.
If there are any discrepancies to address in ratings and employee evaluations, then a discussion on performance review biases has to be had.
The managers should be able to openly discuss any potential biases such as leniency, severity, central tendency, recency, and halo effect, that may have influenced the evaluations. They also need to agree on measures to adjust ratings that are identified as being influenced by bias.
This step is the real meat and bones of performance review calibration. If there are any large discrepancies between the ratings offered by managers toward their direct reports, this is where those ratings have to be adjusted.
The managers in the calibration meeting have to work towards adjusting any inconsistencies in ratings to ensure they are equitable and reflective of actual performance and aim to reach a consensus or a majority agreement on the ratings, with a clear understanding of the reasoning behind them.
An all-in-one performance management tool for Microsoft Teams