When companies started stripping "equity" out of their programs, Keirsten Greggs gave the trend a hashtag: bye bye DEI. A talent acquisition veteran of more than 20 years and the founder of TRAP Recruiter, she's built her career on the parts of hiring most recruiters rush past, and she argues the backlash rests on a misread: that diversity is only about race and gender, when the real definition is much wider than that.
In this episode of the Team Check-In, Keirsten tells host Emre Ok where she'd broaden the lens, from neurodivergent candidates and veterans to parents, older workers, and people without a four-year degree. She explains why affinity bias toward FAANG alumni quietly shuts qualified people out, why feeding old hiring data into AI just automates yesterday's bias, and how she builds trust with candidates long before there's an offer on the table. It all points to the throughline of her approach: recruiting and retention are the same job, because how you treat someone in the first interview is what they remember when they decide whether to stay.
1. Broaden the definition of diversity. Greggs pushes past race and gender to neurodivergent candidates, veterans, parents, older workers, and people whose skills came from somewhere other than a four-year degree. Widen the lens and you reach a genuinely bigger pool.
2. Affinity bias hides inside "culture fit." Whole recruiting tools exist to chase FAANG alumni and coach them through those interviews, which walls out everyone else. Greggs calls it a barrier to entry, not a harmless gut feeling.
3. AI automates the bias you already have. People build and train the models, so pointing a recruiting tool at past hiring data teaches it to repeat past decisions. Keep a human in the loop on the calls that matter.
4. Build relationships before you need them. Don't save your best effort for the VP role or the second interview. Greggs meets candidates on whatever channel they prefer, from a phone call to a camera-optional screen, well before there's an offer on the table.
5. Recruiting and retention are the same job. Hiring doesn't stop at the signed offer letter. The recruiter is a candidate's first impression of the company and often their last, and how they were treated is what they carry into whether they stay, or refer a friend.
Emre (00:00.254)
Yeah, I think you should use this one for honestly recording purposes. That one's really good. Or like any other podcast and stuff. It's a very solid mic. Okay. So I'll just start things off right away as if people are here. So hi everyone. Welcome to another episode of the Team Check-In. I'm your host Emre. And with me today, I have...
Keirsten Greggs (00:09.111)
Now I know.
Emre (00:27.374)
a Forbes coaching council member as a top recruiting influencer, Kirsten Greggs. Hi Kirsten, how are you doing?
Keirsten Greggs (00:37.996)
Hi, I'm Rae. Well, thank you for having me. I'm so excited to be here.
Emre (00:41.748)
Welcome to the show and people can not only know you from your following on social media on LinkedIn or through the Forbes Council, but also through a trapped recruiter, right?
Keirsten Greggs (00:56.291)
Yes.
Emre (00:57.727)
That's perfect. And where did that name come from, the way? Trap.
Keirsten Greggs (01:01.614)
So it's an acronym for Trusted Relationship Builder, Accountable and Proactive. it's not as a glamorous a story as it sounds, but it happened by accident. Not only do I love the style of hip hop called trap music, but I also believe in trust, relationship building, accountability and a proactive approach in recruiting. So I was doing a Facebook quiz. This tells you how long ago that was.
One of the questions was, if I was famous, what would I be known for? And my friend said, trap recruiting. And at the time I was looking for a name for my blog, which was Confessions of a Trap Recruiter. It ended up being Confessions of a Trap Recruiter. And then I said, you know what? My business should be called Trap Recruiter. So here we are.
Emre (01:38.75)
Hehehehehe
Emre (01:54.525)
I love that last episode of the show we had Anna Wildman on and Anna is known for being the person who invented the Cedar Feedback model. And my first question to her about the model was how long did it take for you to come up with the acronym? How hard did you work on it to make sure it was like the name of a tree? Because it fits perfectly with the model as well. But yeah, I love myself a good acronym.
Keirsten Greggs (02:16.216)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (02:22.334)
But can you tell me a bit about your experience with the blog? Because I think there are a lot of people out there who have their opinions and their know-how when it comes to whether it be HR, whether it be recruiting, but it might be a bit intimidating for people to say, you know what, hey, I'm going to throw these out there. I'm going to share my thoughts with the world. So how did you get started with that and where did it go?
Keirsten Greggs (02:46.52)
Wow, I got started actually on a multi-contributor blog called Performance I Create. And that was something that was already established with a group of HR influencers. And they were looking for another person to add to the team who was more focused on recruiting. And that was me. I had been doing something. I had been doing memes at the time under a different name because I was working in corporate and I
did not want to offend people with my sense of humor. We'll leave it at that. So I was doing recruiter problems and that caught on and people liked them. And we started implementing those into the blog as well. But then when it came time for performance I create to be sold, I wanted to continue to talk. I wanted to continue to use my voice because at the time that was the way that things were really getting out there. I wasn't as comfortable on video.
Emre (03:19.476)
You
Keirsten Greggs (03:45.226)
as I am now and I'm still not comfortable with video all the time. I definitely, it definitely wasn't the way that people were connecting. People were just starting to podcast. know, everyone was just starting to podcast at the time. It was more so people wanting to go to a blog and read things when they wanted to or when they felt like it. So that's how that started. It was just me giving my opinions on things that were happening in the recruiter landscape.
Emre (03:59.145)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (04:14.623)
sharing my experiences, being authentic, and that's how I really connected to folks. So I've been very fortunate.
Emre (04:22.214)
And how did it feel as like a creative outlet? Did you find it, you know, helpful, cathartic?
Keirsten Greggs (04:27.542)
Hmm. A lot of times I did, but then there were times that I would pull back and not share things the way that I wanted to. especially when I was being featured on other folks platforms, you know, in an opinion section and the editors would edit things in a, in a way that became more palatable to a, to a wider audience and did not really convey the message that I was really giving. Sometimes the truth.
Emre (04:44.35)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (04:57.306)
hurt. what my mother always says, the truth don't hurt less it ought to.
Emre (05:04.244)
I really want to steal that sentence. I really want to steal that sentence. But I don't think I can do the enunciation the way your mom did. And I think the enunciation is like 60 % of the effect of that sentence. I love it.
Keirsten Greggs (05:05.014)
That felt stifling. You are welcome to it. You're welcome to it.
Keirsten Greggs (05:21.678)
Yes, it is. You could you could change it into Turkish and then that might you might become yeah, you make it a Turkish proverb. There you go.
Emre (05:34.868)
I'll coin it. I'll coin it like that. So I want to go all the way back to memes. So you mentioned recruiter problems. So what were some of the recruiter problems that you were hitting left and right?
Keirsten Greggs (05:53.868)
Recruiter problems were things like the face you make when you're about to make an offer and the hiring manager says the position's on hold. Or a candidate tells you that they need a higher salary because everything they have on is prepaid. Like I had a gentleman tell me, I look good right now, but all of this is prepaid.
there were things like, just things like when you, know, one that goes around a lot and gets remixed a great deal. And I love a good remix is the one where people say, you know, when you upload your resume to an ATS and then you still have to fill in all the information. So there'll be a lot of reaction faces, you know, like the anger faces or, you know, or you have using a GIF, you know, the throwing of the desk.
Emre (06:45.076)
Yeah. Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (06:50.978)
the burning down of the computer, those type of things. So there's a lot of things. One of my, yeah.
Emre (06:53.397)
Yeah. That is incredibly frustrating though. That is incredibly frustrating, that last one.
Keirsten Greggs (06:59.726)
It is. One of my favorites was the days that LinkedIn would have issues and go down. And I was saving, there was this one gif of a gentleman dancing. It's actually a video, it's not even a gif. A gentleman dancing, just having a good time, kind of oblivious to everything else. And I was like, when you're not relying on, I was like, you don't rely 100 % on LinkedIn to fill positions, you can pretty much dance when LinkedIn is down.
Emre (07:30.673)
Pretty much. So, I mean, I would love to discuss memes and HR humor all day. Sadly, the world of human resources and recruiting hasn't been all laughs and jokes lately. And for a bit of context, Kirsten and I, we met before the episode and we discussed, we should go over these talking points.
And one of the talking points we wanted to hit was, you know, diversity, equity and inclusion, and specifically SHRM saying, we're removing equity from that thing, or just overall people slowly abandoning the ENI and yeah, the controversial reactions the entire practice was getting. And at the time we were just saying, yeah, it's just SHRM. And recently now.
The world has gone bonkers!
Keirsten Greggs (08:34.542)
The US has absolutely gone bonkers. I have a whole thing now. just made a hashtag. And it was actually a blog post where I was like, are we saying bye bye to DEI? And I used the Nsync song and some of the lyrics as kind of a throughway. But then I just started.
Emre (08:54.654)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (08:59.022)
And then it kept happening so many times that I just made the hashtag, bye bye DEI. And I would just say today and bye bye DEI because every day it seemed like a new company was abandoning their DEI practices or repackaging them as something else to again, appease a very small group of people who have way too much influence over how we are going to be hiring people or how we are going to ensure
that diversity, equity and inclusion and all of the other letters that you wanna add onto it are going to be affected in the workplace. So, we have places like Tractive Supply Company, John Deere, most recently Walmart, which hurts people in the US, especially those who may not have a target or may not feel like they wanna spend $50.
As a minimum as soon as you walk in to the store because there's something that happens in Target You do not get out on for under $50. It just is a given Then there are companies like Costco who stood up to I'm not going to say the person's name because I don't want to give them a lot of power But you know, there is that one person
Emre (10:11.71)
Mm-hmm. Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (10:15.63)
who seems to be the face of all of this, or it seems to be the person who's saying, yeah, I'm spiritless. And when I send the letter, people listen. That person, they responded to their letter with another letter saying that they were not going to abandon their DEI practices. And then you have a place like McDonald's, which is a global company. And they're saying, yeah, we're not doing it. And they're going even further outside of their hiring practices.
Emre (10:22.099)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (10:44.558)
outside of recognizing racial and gender, I don't even want to use the word quotas because that's not the right term and it has a negative connotation, but they're also abandoning some of their LGBTQIA practices. They said they're not going to be doing a great deal of reporting anymore. And they're also pulling back on supplier diversity, which is a huge, huge issue. When you're talking about the communities in which
Emre (10:54.195)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (11:02.644)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (11:14.336)
your company operates and your potential and your current customers being further marginalized because you've decided that the people that representation doesn't matter that, you know, having a certain number of historically excluded franchise owners and things like that is no longer going to be a priority for your company. That becomes a huge issue when we're talking about what the future of work looks like in America specifically.
Emre (11:34.036)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (11:44.5)
And so let's get right to it. With all these going on, what does the future of work look like?
Keirsten Greggs (11:56.098)
I wish I had a magic eight ball or whatever those things are, crystal ball, I think is the right word. I wish I had one so that I could say what it is. I don't remember seeing a great deal of predictions for 2025, because I think we're still all kind of in a tailspin given the most recent election cycle.
Emre (12:11.208)
Mm-hmm. Uh-huh.
Yeah.
Even.
Keirsten Greggs (12:19.086)
A lot of folks are like, you know what? I mean, it's what day nine of January that we're taping on. And we've already had, you know, several catastrophic and historic events happen just these first few days of 2025, in addition to all of the other things that are lingering from before. So it's hard to say what's going to happen. I think people are going to continue to.
try and find new jobs, because we do have to be sensitive to the fact that there are a lot more people who have been unemployed for six months or more than there were before. I know that people say, look at the jobs numbers, but we have to remember that the jobs numbers and the data are often, don't give the full picture. You have a great deal of people who are no longer searching for jobs, meaning, or who are not receiving unemployment benefits, so they may or may not be counted.
Emre (12:55.604)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (13:14.966)
They may have started businesses, which may not be doing as well as they would like. So, you know, we can't base things solely on the number of jobs that are available, especially when opportunity and access doesn't always meet availability.
Emre (13:32.948)
Yeah, that is very perfectly put. now focusing specifically on the DEI side and, you know, we don't want to get, we really don't want to get political here and we're not going to be like right-wing left-wing. However.
Where do you the second we ask this question, we're kind of begging to be political, but where do you think all this backlash to DNI is coming from? And what's the major misconception around diversity, equity and inclusion?
Keirsten Greggs (14:13.144)
Where is it coming from? Again, I don't want to shine a light on one specific person, but there is a touch point. There is a specific organization that has centered a person. It started with the Supreme Court affirmative action rulings as it related to higher education and rolling back affirmative action policies. But
We all knew that that was going to trickle into not only state and local, but federal government. mean, a lot of people didn't even talk about the fact that during the Biden administration, which is still a few more days, but the Biden administration had a DEI office and they cut that more than a year ago. But no one talked about the fact that they did that because, I'm not going to speculate why they didn't, but they did it too because there was now a federal rule that said,
Emre (14:46.461)
Yeah.
Emre (15:06.27)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (15:10.306)
these that you can't have these types of things. So we needed to be aware of that. To answer your second question, again, this is one of those things people aren't going to like the answer because the misconception is that DEI policies and affirmative action disproportionately help and give an unfair advantage to unqualified people who look like me. OK, and that's not necessarily the case because
Emre (15:34.76)
Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (15:39.96)
If we look at affirmative action numbers and if we look at DEI policies, because there are so many things added to that, in addition to race and ethnicity, in addition to gender, we have sexual orientation, we have differing abilities and that should be included. We have a lot of companies that are counting things like how many veterans they have. Again, these are all things that we should be doing, you know, and these are all pockets and these are all demographics that encapsulate a great number of
other markers. So you can be a veteran and be a lot of different things, you know, of those other things. You can be black and be a lot of different other things. You can be a woman and be a lot of different other things as well. So the issue is that we have some people who have decided that only folks who come from a certain background
and are a certain gender should be in specifically leadership positions or should be given high profile jobs or should be given the highest paying jobs and the most white collar jobs we'll say, because people don't care when it's, you you have women specifically.
Emre (16:54.835)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (17:05.42)
Black women and women from Hispanic backgrounds who are disproportionately in service jobs, specifically like housekeeping and customer service, things like that. They don't care about that. They care about when that one person who went to school for 16 years, you know, served in multiple organizations and rose through the ranks, you know, is given.
a job, you know, it's something they're like, that person's a DEI hire. It's like, are you silly? Like, are you silly? Like, don't be weird.
Emre (17:40.528)
Of course.
Yeah, of course. And it's always these hypotheticals, aren't they? When it comes to discussing, you know, when people are reacting to D &I and when people are talking about it negatively, it's always, you know, this hypothetical of, this person was a D &I hire, you know, they hire a surgeon as a D &I hire, and he will leave someone dead on the table because they're not competent on it. Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (17:47.671)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (18:06.531)
Yeah.
Emre (18:13.236)
we, yeah, we were talking about, Bonnie Dilbar about the subject as well. And she said, I have never met once met someone who was like, who fit, you know, the DNI bill and wasn't competent at their job, you know, who are hired because, you know, they were hired, you know, they were hired because they were competent at their jobs. And I think a lot of the backlash is.
Keirsten Greggs (18:32.103)
yeah.
Emre (18:43.199)
coming if we're dissecting the acronym, a lot of the backlash, because people can't really say they're against the D part of it. They can't really say, I'm against diversity or the I. So the E, equity, is doing a lot of heavy lifting. are focusing their attack on the N, I to the equity part of it. And they're saying, it's not what you know.
Keirsten Greggs (19:03.458)
Yes.
Emre (19:12.786)
This concept of equality, equity isn't equality. And it shouldn't be. That's why equity is something else. That's why it is its own word. Because equity, the term equity, assumes that, we are not all coming into this game from a leveled playing field. when we abandon equity,
Keirsten Greggs (19:27.18)
Yes.
Emre (19:41.982)
we start assuming that, know, everyone is starting off from the same footing and, you know, they all have, you know, the same chance at succeeding, which we know is just objectively not true.
Emre (19:58.937)
And another thing I want to ask you when it comes to the DNI is when we're talking about diversity in the workplace, sometimes the definition immediately shifts to either race, gender and ethnicity. So are we still being exclusionary? What are some areas where we're thinking, what are some groups of people that
Keirsten Greggs (20:11.672)
Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (20:16.867)
Yes.
Emre (20:28.222)
fit in the DNI circle but are not usually that much thought about.
Keirsten Greggs (20:34.03)
Absolutely, it's our neurodivergent communities as well as folks that have, you know, maybe have physical, I don't think we're supposed to use the word disability, but they have different physical abilities and things like that. So we often forget those people. Again, I think we often forget veterans.
Emre (20:51.604)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (21:00.942)
You know, we could literally make a...
diversity category or demographic for a lot of things. know, mothers or parents could be a diversity category. Again, veterans is a diversity category. Early career is a diversity category. And I specifically said early career and not recent college graduates because we also have to look at education and how education is often a barrier to employment.
in ways that it shouldn't be because every job does not require a college degree. There are other ways to access employment, but sometimes we say, you have to have a bachelor's degree. And if you have an associate's degree, then get paid less. And if you have a technical degree, then you get paid less. Or you only get paid when you get a certification along with that technical degree. So there are lot of other things we could be thinking about that we absolutely don't. And I say that not to
Emre (21:46.579)
Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (22:02.858)
undermine or to diminish what, again, someone who looks like me, the type of access and opportunities that they need access to. But again, we often fit those other demographics as well. So you'll be capturing us. You'll be capturing a more diverse group of people when you broaden your definition.
Emre (22:28.702)
Yeah. I love that. And what you said about education and how you, and again, that is a very important distinction. A lot of people, we keep making that mistake of, know, early career versus recent college graduate, right? When people think, you know, early in their careers, we immediately go to, you, so they're fresh out of college. And if they're not, that's not even like, that's
Keirsten Greggs (22:53.262)
College, yeah.
Emre (22:58.429)
Again, it's out of the discussion, which is nonsense because look, I love my bachelor's degree. had a great time getting it, but I don't think my bachelor's in English literature, all the studies, like, you know, all those lessons on, you know, Victorian theater and my little, my papers on, you know, world building and JRR Tolkien. Are they that relevant to my job in marketing? I mean, I, I could, I could.
Keirsten Greggs (23:24.664)
They might be actually today. They might be. Yeah.
Emre (23:27.428)
I could argue, I could make the argument, I could totally make the argument, I can definitely say that they make me very unfun at parties, but, you know, okay, depending on the party, sure.
Keirsten Greggs (23:41.902)
as I'm literally dressed like a librarian right now. Thank you.
Emre (23:44.916)
You
I love that. But yeah, that distinction between college graduate and not, again, that's another key part that we're totally blanking out on. Now.
Keirsten Greggs (24:01.006)
Yes. And even when we talked about age, but I can't exclude folks who are later in their careers or returning back to the workforce or who are older and want to continue to work because they enjoy it. They want to have something to do. mean, you know, they didn't get elected to Congress. I'm sorry. Don't. You could cut that.
Emre (24:19.924)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (24:25.448)
Yeah.
No, it's on. It's fine. It's fine. that is actually something that hits really close to home with me because my father was out of a job very late in his life, right? And he was, I mean, he was like the classic company man, right? He was at the same company, rose to like a high level management position, but he was there.
Keirsten Greggs (24:32.398)
Sorry.
Emre (24:58.207)
for most of his life, decades, and suddenly industry shifts, whatever, perfectly normal reasons, out of a job. now look, in my late 50s, looking for a new job, looking for a new position. think that, I mean, watching that was like, I I know for a fact that my dad was like very solid, like just energetic, just...
lively, whatever. But when you're filtering applications, they're like, yep, I got a gajillion applications on this job, so let's filter them according to age. Let's filter them according to experience. Let's filter them according that. You are actually missing out on tons of quality candidates. That's very true. So taking this.
Keirsten Greggs (25:39.47)
Emre (25:51.38)
What are some areas where you think traditional recruitment methods are failing when it comes to DEI?
Keirsten Greggs (25:59.51)
All the ones we just mentioned, specifically neurodivergence, specifically age discrimination. Like you said, we are filtering out people who have more experience saying they're overqualified. We are filtering out younger people or people who maybe started their careers later, who may have done, who may have transferable skills from another.
type of employment. We don't look at them as being valuable in the workplace, again, if they don't have certain degrees or if they didn't work for a certain company. There is a great deal, especially in the tech sector, there is a great deal of, I don't think discrimination, I think bias is the better word, a great deal of bias in favor of, so an affinity bias for people who come from certain companies.
You have recruiters whose sole purpose as sorcerers is to go after the Fang current former employees. Like you have you have tools that were created HR tech and talent acquisition tech tools that were created to attract these candidates that are
Emre (27:08.116)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (27:26.114)
that were created to teach these job seekers who want to get employment in these fan companies how to interview there. So they give them their interview questions. They tell them where they go. yeah, absolutely. You have entire, like, again, technology built around certain companies specifically. And that is a form of, that is a barrier to entry.
Emre (27:37.231)
wow.
Keirsten Greggs (27:55.2)
And it will continue to keep people who are historically excluded, exclude, know, currently excluded or what's the right term, contemporarily excluded from those companies. Yeah.
Emre (28:02.068)
Mm-hmm.
Mm-hmm. There you go, there you have it.
Emre (28:12.445)
Yeah, a lot of the time the atmosphere in, you know, tech companies and, you know, gaming companies specifically, they're described more like very recently with recent events as like a boys club and not the most hospitable atmosphere.
Keirsten Greggs (28:19.598)
Mmm.
Keirsten Greggs (28:26.307)
Yes.
Keirsten Greggs (28:31.8)
Yes. And again, it's the bias that we don't look at or it's those gut feelings that we have. I don't want to call people out. So this was one of the recruiter problems and it's that gut feeling or that affinity bias. And I don't like to use the word unconscious bias because I think a lot of people, I think that gives it too much.
thing like, well, everybody has them. We don't recognize them. No, you recognize that you specifically decided to not take that person seriously because they didn't make eye contact with you in a way that fit your cultural norms. But like I said, when you have someone who is from another
Emre (28:57.959)
leeway
Emre (29:08.756)
Mm-hmm. Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (29:23.51)
religion or who is from another culture that doesn't always translate here. And I can speak for the US because I remember one there, there's a specific situation where it was Ramadan and the person in a person sent a message to HR saying that they would need to do X, Y, and Z, you know, to go for their prayer time. And the HR person, a senior HR person felt the need to send out an email.
Emre (29:44.574)
Mm-hmm. Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (29:52.12)
to the entire like HR staff, because this was an HR professional as well, and single this person out saying, make sure, and I know that the intention was that like to do that, but like, don't do that. Like again, because.
Emre (30:08.804)
Okay, what's the finish that story? Because what what was the message sent out?
Keirsten Greggs (30:10.734)
They were like, basically like, basically like, don't bother them. They're going to be praying at this time and that time. And they're going to be like, no, that's not like, like basically like if they're missing, you know, like don't come and tell on them because they're probably just praying. You know, like it was like that kind of thing or don't invite them to any potlucks and don't invite them to any.
out to lunch because they're they're fasting and it's like
Keirsten Greggs (30:46.286)
I said it was the intention, but.
Emre (30:46.804)
Okay, see, I see the intention. I see the intention that's...
Keirsten Greggs (30:53.432)
The impact was extremely disparaging and it was inappropriate. It was highly inappropriate.
Emre (30:54.802)
Yeah. Yeah.
Emre (31:05.16)
Yeah, Kirsten, the way you told that story, that was a roller coaster ride for me. Okay. Yeah, because you did it perfectly, but to just, yeah, it was, but it was such a roller coaster ride, right? Cause I was like, they sent this, you know, that they all, you know, they're, they're, know, observing Ramadan. So they will be fasting. And, and I said, okay. And since we're talking, you know, recruiter problems, you know, bad scenarios.
Keirsten Greggs (31:10.444)
I'm sorry, I didn't do it correctly.
Keirsten Greggs (31:15.603)
okay.
Emre (31:34.748)
In my head, I'm going, what's the worst that can happen? no. Where's the worst that can go? And then, yeah. And then when you said, and then they sent out an email to the entire company, I'm going, no, no,
Keirsten Greggs (31:38.254)
that's not even the worst that can happen.
Keirsten Greggs (31:48.694)
No, no, not the entire company, the entire HR, like the, but it was enough people that it was like, don't do this. Yeah.
Emre (31:52.489)
Yeah, yeah, enough people. Yeah, in my head I was going, no, no, what it is. Turns out it was just, know, an email that's sent out with good intentions, but just an overall negative impact, right? You're singling someone out and, but again, I think a lot of the discourse when it comes to political,
political correctness, quote unquote, wokeness and diversity, equity and inclusion is when someone is surrounded around, you know, people overreacting in a very hostile way, even when people are doing not the nicest things, but still with good intentions. So.
Keirsten Greggs (32:24.654)
Mmm.
Emre (32:45.767)
a huge part of the discourse from the anti-DNI and anti-political correctness kind of, you know, that community would be to that, know, they sent out one harmless email with good intentions and they got cancelled and they were, you know, they received all the backlash in the world. It was probably, you know, it where instead it should just be, hey,
Keirsten Greggs (33:06.381)
Yeah.
Emre (33:14.696)
I'm not very comfortable with that. sorry. That could have been, that's usually the direction it should go in. now, especially when you mentioned these unconscious biases, a lot of the discourse around it is that, nevermind, AI is going to solve that in the recruitment process now. And yeah, so.
What do you think about that, Kirsten?
Keirsten Greggs (33:47.438)
Well, Humans?
program AI and humans train AI. And if humans have bias and if humans have misgivings, they are injecting them into the technology. That is probably the most politically correct way that I can say that. because we all know that AI is not as ethical as we would like it to be. And again,
That's a callback to.
who is behind the technology. there was, it may have been two years ago. I think the, you know, the whole 2020 to 2024 is pretty much a blur for me. I don't really know when the years changed. So I think it was maybe two years ago, there was an AI image generated. I happened to share it that asked,
Emre (34:32.5)
Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (35:00.214)
what university professors would look like in certain departments.
Emre (35:09.038)
Alright. Okay.
Keirsten Greggs (35:12.034)
So obviously the science teachers looked like, what do think they looked like? What do you think the sociology teacher looked like? Or professor, I should say. What do you think the history professor looked like? So there was that, and it was a show of bias. Most recently, did you see that Metta put out these fake human beings?
Emre (35:17.736)
Yeah.
Emre (35:23.666)
Yeah.
Emre (35:30.772)
Yeah.
Emre (35:42.253)
I did not know about that. I missed that.
Keirsten Greggs (35:43.468)
You missed that out. I'll email that to you. They took them down, but they created two fake humans and then some people engaged with them. But they were both visibly or they were both presented as black and or African American. And. And it was just very stereotypical. was again, it was very what the.
Emre (36:01.492)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (36:12.106)
anti-woke people would think that someone who looked like that, how they should talk, how they should react, how, you know, what's important to them. And it was, it was really interesting to me that their first two AI human beings were, were black. So that's telling you that like, why are we trying that they're trying to get you to train these
Emre (36:14.1)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (36:22.1)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (36:40.52)
Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (36:40.78)
models better to engage in a way that's more comfortable for Black people.
Emre (36:46.069)
Yeah, I mean, the future is horrifying. If you look, the future is horrifying. And look, if you train an AI recruitment tool based on your previous recruitment data, you're just training it on the previous biases that your organization had. And I'm not, and by no means am I
Keirsten Greggs (36:50.07)
hahahaha
Keirsten Greggs (37:07.03)
Absolutely.
Emre (37:15.292)
anti-AI in recruitment or anywhere else because it is obviously and when these days when we're talking about AI, we're specific, people are always talking about large language models and stuff. yeah, it's, it's, yeah, we're talking, uh-huh. Yeah, that's very true.
Keirsten Greggs (37:29.326)
They're really talking about automation. Most people are only talking about automation. Like what we're really using it for is to help us be a little bit more efficient, to answer those questions that don't need a great deal of research or that can point you to another place that you can easily access that information on your own. And I'm speaking of things like chat bots that are designed to answer your question about where to, about
Emre (37:39.869)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (37:45.897)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (37:54.526)
Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (37:58.954)
benefits. well, here's our benefit summary. Like they can easily give you that information. How do I apply for this job? How do I reset my password? Because I uploaded my resume, but it wants me to put all this other information in again. Where am I in the process when a recruiter might be overloaded and they don't have the time to answer every single person who's responding to them and give them a white glove service. But we cannot take these, we cannot take the humans out of the loop.
Emre (38:03.379)
Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (38:28.534)
That's a term that my good friend Tia Tucker taught me while we were doing an AI project this summer for job seekers. We were looking at some tools that job seekers could use for their job search from both a recruitment perspective, recruiter perspective, me, and from a job seeker perspective, which she stood in for as a project manager and someone who is well trained in human factors. So, starting by human in the loop and why it's important that we don't erase.
a person from making decisions, especially when it comes to recruitment processes and hiring practices.
Emre (38:58.536)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (39:05.768)
Yeah, and it's such a nuanced conversation, right? The entire recruitment process, the relationship you build with the candidates throughout that process, it's so nuanced that while automation should certainly be a part of it because it's hard to imagine a work life without automation right now with the convenience it brings. It shouldn't be a part of, like it shouldn't.
Keirsten Greggs (39:09.25)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (39:12.94)
Hmm
Emre (39:34.81)
eat away from the one-on-one relationships and again the nuance of that conversation. In fact, it should be used to save you more time to focus on the more human side of it.
Keirsten Greggs (39:45.528)
Yes. Ooh, that's it. Thank you. I love that. Thank you for saying that.
Emre (39:51.797)
Yeah. Yay. a term has been a term that's always been coming up from the since the beginning of this episode has been relationship building. All right. It's the R of trap recruitment. Where did the B go in the acronym? Nobody knows. There's a neat little dash between there. So it's fine.
Keirsten Greggs (40:21.108)
Listen, you didn't have to point that out because no one's ever said what happened to the bee and I was like
Emre (40:29.534)
Point what out, nevermind, it's done. It's one word. That's perfectly fine. That's perfectly fine. But in the landscape that we have today, in today's climate, how do we introduce trust and relationship building into the recruitment process and beyond going into employment?
Keirsten Greggs (40:30.51)
It's one word, it's one word, relationship building, one word.
Keirsten Greggs (40:54.872)
just by being more transparent and being, and not waiting to build relationships when you're at a certain point in the recruitment funnel. Like you don't wait to build relationships at the second interview when there's a good chance that this person's going to make it to the final round or going to be like, you don't wait to build relationships until you have a position open that
Emre (41:07.049)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (41:24.928)
excites you the most, you know, like until I get that VP position on my player, until I get these 10 customer success manager positions on my plate, I'm only going to build relationships in certain communities with certain types of people because these other jobs, know, like the, these other people, like I don't need to build relationships with them. We should be doing it well beforehand and we should be doing it with authenticity.
with transparency and with flexibility. And that's where the reaching different communities helps. Because again, I'm a Gen Xer. So you have some of us that are very comfortable with or prefer to be contacted via text or prefer to only communicate via or.
prefer to communicate via email or to get messages and updates. Then you have others who still want to be called and wants someone to leave them a message or don't want to be text. Like don't text me if you are not my friend, my family member. Then you have the later generations who prefer to communicate via technology exclusively because their phone
doesn't ring or if it does ring, they're like, what is happening? Like, what is this? Like what, is this thing? I go through this with my youngest niece who just turned 18 last month and she, or two months ago, it's January now. She has this thing where she doesn't make phone calls. She FaceTime, like her, her, her, her go-to is FaceTime. And I'm like.
When it first started, I was like, what? Like, why do you?
Emre (43:18.578)
That's very intense.
Keirsten Greggs (43:20.792)
But that's the way that she communicates with her friends. That's the way she communicates with her generation. The same thing for us, even pre-screen calls now for recruiters like.
gosh, do we have to be on camera all the time? Like I felt like this in the 2020s and 2021, cause it wasn't always like that, but every, lot of folks were having to be remote and not be co-located. But I would specifically say if it was like the initial film screen, this is an audio only, caught like, you do not have to turn your camera on. but I would give people the option, like if they turned their camera, if they came on,
with video, I would turn my camera on. So I was always prepared. I never made someone feel like, don't do that, that's wrong. That's the way that they wanted to communicate. That's the way that they wanted to connect. So I was always flexible in ensuring that I communicated with them as best I could and when I could accommodate how they wanted to be engaged.
Emre (44:27.156)
That's perfect. That's perfect. And how do you think a relationship building approach to recruiting carries over when the employee is now, you know, recruited and is a part of the company? Do you think there are some, you know, residual benefits to that? Do you think it impacts their? Yeah.
Keirsten Greggs (44:45.87)
Absolutely. Absolutely. Because when you're bringing in people from, you know, that feel valued and you're bringing in people who feel like they have a voice and that they can bring you feedback and they can talk to you or they feel like that you keep them informed, they inform others. So, you know, that's going to improve your employee referral. It's going to broaden your employee referrals. You're not going to stay in those little silos that you're in only going to these core schools and, you know, these core past.
Emre (45:11.892)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (45:15.63)
past companies again, that's a recruiting practice that goes back to when I was in staffing, you know, the first year I was a recruiter, like we targeted companies, we targeted certain people, we targeted, that sounds very bad. I shouldn't use targeted anymore.
I just heard myself say over and over again. I'm like, that might not be the best word.
Emre (45:38.078)
You heard it here first, folks. That's an epiphany right there.
Keirsten Greggs (45:41.442)
That might not be the best word. know, we, we focus or we center certain things and certain people. So, it will also help you with retention. you know, recruiting and retention, a lot of us are coming to the understanding and the acceptance that it is the same thing because you're, you are, you know, when we say we're always recruiting and, know, it's the same way job seekers say you're always interviewing for your next job. Well, you're always recruiting.
Emre (45:52.521)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (46:09.972)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (46:11.488)
as well. The recruiting doesn't stop when the person signs the offer letter. The recruiting doesn't stop when the person starts that first day. And if you drop them off that first day or after that 90 day program that you put them in during onboarding, which most of them hate anyway, by the way, if you, if you stop your, your, your connection, if you stop your, if you close the door, you know, once they're settled in and they're out of their probation,
airy period or they're out of that, what you've got, what people feel is like they're, you know, that window of time where, Ooh, we don't, have to be, you know, overly nice and we have to be overly accessible. We have to be overly accommodating to this person. If you stop there and you never talk to that person again, you never hear from them again, you don't answer their emails, you don't answer their calls. Well, they're not going to stay very long. And recruiters, unfortunately,
Or maybe fortunately, this is how deep your influence goes. You're not only the first point of contact when people are looking for their job or they're looking for an entryway into the organization, you're not only their first impression of the company, you're also their last because they're going to come to you when they're looking for a new job either within the company or if you leave, they're going to remember how you treated them and they're going to say, I had a good experience with that recruiter and I'm looking for a new job. I'm going to reach out to them and see what
Emre (47:24.372)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (47:32.556)
what they're doing over there.
Emre (47:34.485)
That is so perfectly true. That is so perfectly true. I remember I'm not going to name any names, name any companies, but when I was applying for a job at a certain company, and this was years back, but believe it or not, I had the same very long hair. And the first thing I heard during the job interview was this was for a teacher's job, by the way, this was when I was an English teacher and
Keirsten Greggs (47:53.23)
Okay.
Emre (48:03.494)
At some point, you we had the job interview and it was perfectly fine. Like they wanted me to start there and I liked the school and, the, of the teachers, but the HR director told me, but we have one tiny problem. Your hair. Like that's, that's way too long. And, know, you should be, more proper. And the thing is.
I, at that time, I would understand, you know, hey, this company has a certain dress code. That's, that's the way we dress at school. That's the way we want teachers to be, you know, even that sounds kind of off, but the way, the way he phrased it was, you know, as a teacher, you should be a role model. So, and that took me right out by that.
I ended up working there, but I can guarantee you that my first six months, you know, or however long it was, that interaction was on the back of my mind, just the whole time. And it just detached me from the organization like that. And so even though I was recruited, I was working there now as part of the team, I got
I made it past all that. See, and even though my example is just a very extreme case and a huge fall par, that's all the little bits and pieces, all the interactions and even one off sentence uttered throughout the recruitment process. You have no idea how long that will stay with the employee during their employment. And that can be a benefit that can be
Keirsten Greggs (49:50.274)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (49:55.064)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (50:00.233)
That can be as detrimental as it can be beneficial because that can also set a very positive, a very strong relationship going into the employment that can get that person through a very difficult onboarding process, a very rough probation period. And it can get that individual past those with flying codes with a lot of trust in the organization.
Keirsten Greggs (50:18.947)
Yeah.
Emre (50:28.36)
I mean, I know which one I would rather have a company that, I'm a part of. And I think that kind of leads into that person. I mean, as a recruiter, you know, this better than anyone. is much, much better to recruit internally for upcoming positions and like for higher positions that are higher up than to look for someone on the outside. Right. Yeah. And I think.
Keirsten Greggs (50:53.345)
Absolutely.
Emre (50:57.234)
The initial recruitment process and the positive relationship you're building right there is definitely going to affect the career trajectory of your new hire within the company.
Keirsten Greggs (51:08.608)
Yeah, I think a lot. So I don't know if it's a maturity thing or it's a experience thing, but I can tell you that my overall attitude towards internal placement or internal mobility changed over time. And not in the sense that I was focused on, internals don't deserve these positions.
Emre (51:25.15)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (51:38.03)
I want to bring somebody from the outside. It was because we separated external and internal recruiters instead of letting everyone do the same thing because you're building muscles. The processes are different and some of the things that need to be done are different. But when you're hiring internal, you're also learning about different departments. And if I'm going to be honest, you're actually now have two positions.
Emre (51:45.428)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (51:53.182)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (52:06.604)
Because if they fill the role you have open, now you get to backfill them with someone else. And if you fill that job, so like that multiplies it, you know, get to do different things. But I think that's where it came from because you had recruiters are very competitive. So you had recruiters who are now feeling like, you know, those the what we'll call the desk recruiters in a corporate setting. You you have the desk recruiters that are competing with third party recruiters because they have hiring managers who
Emre (52:07.668)
Mm-hmm.
Emre (52:13.105)
Mm-hmm.
Mm-hmm.
Emre (52:29.193)
Mm-hmm.
Keirsten Greggs (52:35.138)
go to their favorite agencies and say, hey, they give them the rec sometimes before they give it, before they upload it into the internal system. And then, and now you have to compete with internal recruiters too. So you're at a disadvantage. You feel like, but like I said, as you mature and as you gain an understanding, you realize that's not the case and you're doing better for the company. Also companies need to realize that they're creating unnecessary competition.
when they're doing things like that and when they're viewing the recruitment and the treatment of the process that people are going, they're viewing the treatment and the recruitment of internals versus externals as something that's exclusive of one another when it's not. The process, the steps in the process may be a little bit different, but the actual function should be the same.
Emre (53:27.888)
I love that. And Kirsten, I don't think I can add anything on top of that. That was very well put. And we've been going for up to 55 minutes, almost an hour now. No, no, that's perfect. That's perfect. That shows that this has been a great conversation. And hey, if you're looking for an HR software that will take you beyond the recruitment process into the onboarding...
Keirsten Greggs (53:35.48)
Thank you.
Keirsten Greggs (53:39.566)
Oh, I'm sorry. We went too long.
Emre (53:56.437)
into just employee onboarding, performance reviews, employee engagement surveys, 360 degree feedback, one-on-one meetings, employee recognition, one that does it all and does it all very well right inside Microsoft Teams and Outlook, so it keeps it all neatly tied in that Microsoft ecosystem, then you should give Team Flex a try. And you can try it for absolutely free with full functionality up to 10 users by clicking the link in the description. Kirsten.
Thanks so much for coming on the show. I loved every bit of this conversation.
Keirsten Greggs (54:31.17)
Thank you as well. Thank you for having me.
Emre (54:33.743)
And where can people find you?
Keirsten Greggs (54:36.223)
everywhere at Trap Recruiter.
Emre (54:38.866)
That's perfect. That's perfect. And this has been the Team Check-In everyone. Bye bye.

